The accused at the Pendle witch trials of 1612

The Pendle Witch Trials: Surprising Truths

Free Illustrated Posters. Free to download.
Written by Simon A. Williams

The Pendle witch trials of 1612 have accumulated four centuries of legend, and most of what people assume about the case is wrong. This is not the full story of the trials, it is a myth-by-myth audit of the specific claims that popular retellings keep getting wrong, checked against what the surviving court record actually says.

Key Facts

  • Date: Trials 18 to 20 August 1612; hangings 20 August 1612
  • Location: Pendle Hill, Lancashire; tried at Lancaster Castle
  • Key figures: Elizabeth Southerns (Old Demdike), Anne Whittle (Old Chattox), Alizon Device, Jennet Device, Roger Nowell
  • Outcome: Ten hanged at Gallows Hill, Lancaster; one acquitted; one died in prison before trial
  • Primary source: Thomas Potts, The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster (1613)
  • Significance: One of England's most documented witch trials; established child testimony as precedent in capital cases
 For students covering GCSE History (AQA Early Modern Britain or OCR Witchcraze) or anyone exploring Jacobean legal history.

 

I have spent considerable time with the primary sources of the 1612 Pendle trials, and what strikes me most is how much of the modern retelling does not survive contact with them. Ghost tours, novels, and Halloween marketing have smoothed the case into a familiar shape: a coven, a curse, a witch-finder. The actual record is stranger and more mundane than that, and several of the "facts" repeated most often about Pendle simply are not true. For the full narrative of what happened, read Pendle Witches: The Real Story. This piece is narrower: it is a list of the specific claims about the case that are widely believed and demonstrably wrong, or at least far more complicated than the legend allows.

Myth: They Were the Worst Witch Trial in Europe

Deserted Lancashire village in the early seventeenth century

Ten deaths at Pendle is the largest single witch execution event in recorded English history, and that scale is genuinely why the case is remembered. But set against the wider European witch craze, it is a small number. Historians estimate that somewhere between 40,000 and 60,000 people were executed for witchcraft across early modern Europe, with the German territories alone accounting for a large share of that total through sustained, torture-driven mass trials that sometimes killed hundreds in a single town. England, by comparison, executed roughly 500 people for witchcraft across the entire period from the 1500s to the 1700s. Pendle stands out in English history. It does not stand out in European history, and treating it as though it does understates how much worse the continental witch hunts actually were.

Myth: They Confessed Under Torture

Judicial torture to extract a witchcraft confession was standard practice in Scotland and across much of continental Europe. It was not legally sanctioned in England. The Demdike and Chattox confessions, and Jennet Device's testimony, were extracted through aggressive, leading interrogation by magistrate Roger Nowell, not the rack or the thumbscrew. That distinction does not make the confessions reliable. Leading questions put to a frightened, elderly, possibly cognitively impaired woman, or to a nine-year-old dependent on the goodwill of the man questioning her, can produce a false confession just as effectively as physical pain. But the absence of formal torture in the English system is one of the more surprising and under-reported facts about how the case was actually built.

Myth: Alice Nutter Was a Poor, Desperate Old Woman Like the Others

The image of the Pendle accused as uniformly destitute is largely accurate, with one significant exception. Alice Nutter was a gentlewoman, a landowner of comfortable means with no known connection to the cunning-folk trade practised by the Demdike and Chattox families. Why she was present at the Malkin Tower gathering, and why she was convicted alongside people from a completely different social class, has never been satisfactorily explained by the surviving record. Some historians have speculated she was targeted over a land dispute or her family's Catholic sympathies rather than any genuine belief she practised witchcraft. Her case is the clearest evidence that poverty was not, on its own, sufficient to explain who ended up on the gallows.

Myth: Malkin Tower Was a Witches' Lair

The name conjures something out of a horror film. The likelier reality is duller: "Malkin" probably derives from "Malt Kiln", a drying tower used in the everyday business of processing grain, and the building itself was most likely the Device family's modest farmhouse rather than a purpose-built den of sorcery. The Good Friday 1612 gathering there, framed by the prosecution as a Grand Assembly of twenty witches plotting to blow up Lancaster Castle, coincided with a single stolen sheep being eaten by a group of people facing steep rent increases and the loss of their local charity networks. It reads far more like a meeting about how to survive the winter than a terrorist cell.

Myth: Pendle Was the Last English Witch Trial

It is tempting to imagine 1612 as the dramatic climax of English witch persecution. It was not even close to the end. England continued to try and, in a smaller number of cases, execute people for witchcraft for another seventy years after the Pendle hangings, and the underlying statute stayed on the books for well over a century. What actually happened to English witchcraft law after 1612, including the eventual repeal of the Act that convicted the Pendle accused, is covered in the case's long legal aftermath.

Myth: Nobody at the Time Thought This Was Absurd

Modern audiences sometimes assume seventeenth-century England was uniformly credulous about witchcraft. Scepticism existed, and it existed publicly. Reginald Scot's 1584 book The Discoverie of Witchcraft had already argued that most witchcraft accusations were the product of fraud, delusion, or the persecution of vulnerable old women, and it was influential enough that James I is said to have ordered copies burned after he came to the English throne, precisely because it contradicted his own Daemonologie. The Pendle prosecution did not happen in an intellectual vacuum where everyone agreed witches were real. It happened despite a live public argument about whether they were, with the King's own preferences tipping the scales in the courtroom.

Myth: The Story We Have Is a Neutral Transcript

A copy of The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster, published 1613 by Thomas Potts

Almost everything written about Pendle since 1613 traces back to one source: Thomas Potts's The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster. Potts was a court clerk commissioned to write the account, and it was published with the presiding judges' approval. It reads like reportage. It functions like advocacy. Confessions are recorded selectively, dialogue is dramatised, and the narrative consistently flatters the judges and vindicates the Crown's pursuit of witchcraft. Treating Potts's pamphlet as an objective transcript, rather than a piece of state-sanctioned legal propaganda, is probably the single most consequential misreading of this case still in circulation. If you want to examine the primary source material yourself, The Pendle Machine walks through the confessions, court records, and witness statements in forensic detail.

What the Trials Were Actually About

The Pendle witch trials are sometimes described as an outbreak of mass hysteria. That framing lets the real actors off too lightly. There was a magistrate who identified an opportunity. There were judges who wanted to please the king. There was a community fractured by poverty and long-running feuds. And there was a legal system willing to accept the word of a nine-year-old child as sufficient to hang her mother. Jennet Device's later life provides a grim postscript: in 1633, she was herself accused of witchcraft, and spent time in prison before the case against her was exposed as fabricated. The wheel of accusation, it turned out, spared no one who had once been touched by it.

The Pendle Witch Conspiracy by Simon A. Williams

True Crime · British History

The Pendle Witch Conspiracy

Ten people were hanged at Lancaster Castle in 1612. Not one of them was a witch.

Strip away four centuries of folklore and you find something far darker: a legal system deliberately weaponised against the poor and powerless. Simon A. Williams exposes how a single accusation on a Lancashire road triggered a conspiracy of fear, bent law, and state violence that still echoes today.

  • → How a child's testimony condemned the innocent - and why the court allowed it
  • → The hidden political machinery behind England's most notorious witch trials
  • → Four hundred years old. The mechanisms of power are not.

By Simon A. Williams · Writer, researcher, and Editor-in-Chief of Histories and Castles

Buy on Amazon

This link takes you to Amazon.co.uk to complete your purchase.

People Also Ask

Were the Pendle witches really devil worshippers plotting against the King?

No. The prosecution characterised the Good Friday 1612 gathering at Malkin Tower as a plot by twenty witches to blow up Lancaster Castle, but the surviving evidence points to a meeting of impoverished subtenants, mostly elderly women and their families, who were dealing with steep rent increases and the loss of local charity following the dissolution of Whalley Abbey. There is no credible evidence of an organised satanic conspiracy against the Crown.

Did England execute as many people for witchcraft as continental Europe?

No, not by a wide margin. Historians estimate England executed roughly 500 people for witchcraft across the entire early modern period, compared with tens of thousands across the German territories and other parts of continental Europe, where judicial torture was legally permitted and mass trials could kill hundreds of people in a single town. The ten hangings at Pendle make it the largest single witch execution event in English history, but a small case by European standards.

Were the Pendle confessions extracted through torture?

Judicial torture was not legally sanctioned in the English system, unlike in Scotland and much of continental Europe. The confessions of Demdike, Chattox, and other accused were obtained through sustained, aggressive interrogation by magistrate Roger Nowell rather than physical torture. This does not mean the confessions were reliable: leading questions put to elderly, vulnerable, or very young witnesses can produce false admissions without any physical coercion at all.

Was Thomas Potts's account of the trials a neutral record?

No. Thomas Potts was a court clerk commissioned by the presiding judges to write up the proceedings, and his book, The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster (1613), was published with their approval. It shaped confessions and testimony to present the prosecution favourably, and functions as a piece of judicial propaganda justifying the executions rather than a neutral transcript of what was said in court.

Was Alice Nutter poor like the other accused?

No. Alice Nutter was a gentlewoman of comfortable means and a landowner, unlike the impoverished cunning-folk families at the centre of the case. Why she was present at Malkin Tower and convicted alongside them has never been fully explained by the surviving record, and some historians have suggested a land dispute or her family's Catholic sympathies as possible motives for her inclusion in the prosecution.

Are the Pendle witch trials included in Pearson Edexcel A-Level History?

Yes. The Pendle witch trials of 1612 are included in the Pearson Edexcel A-Level History course as part of Paper 3, Option 33: The Witch Craze in Britain, Europe and North America, c1580–c1750. They are studied within the topic “The Lancashire witches of 1604–13.”

Students examine the background to the trials, including the Witchcraft Act of 1604, religious and social tensions in Lancashire, the conflict between the Device and Chattox families, and the investigation led by Roger Nowell. The course also considers the Lancaster assizes of 1612, the evidence given by Jennet Device, the role of Thomas Potts's published account and the execution of ten people.

Where can I buy books about the Pendle witch trials?

The book The Pendle Witch Conspiracy is available on Amazon in paperback and Kindle. An Investigated History digital download is available exclusively from Histories and Castles. The investigation follows events, from a roadside dispute over metal pins to the book that sealed the verdict for four centuries.

Primary Sources and Further Reading

Potts, Thomas (1613): The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster, W. Stansby for John Barnes. The court clerk's account of the 1612 trials; the foundational primary source, though shaped as prosecution propaganda. Available via Early English Books Online and WorldCat.

James I (1597): Daemonologie, Robert Walde-grave. The king's personal treatise on witchcraft that established the cultural and legal climate in which the Pendle trials took place. Available via Project Gutenberg.

Scot, Reginald (1584): The Discoverie of Witchcraft. An earlier, sceptical English treatise arguing that most witchcraft accusations arose from fraud or delusion; useful context for how contested the belief in witchcraft already was by 1612.

Williams, Simon A. (2024): The Pendle Witch Conspiracy: The True Story Behind England's Most Notorious Witch Trials, Histories and Castles. A forensic re-examination of the primary record. Available on Amazon UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0GXHYJXRX

This article is part of the Wizardry and Witching series. Read all articles at historiesandcastles.com/blogs/witches.

Deepen Your Understanding

→ Pendle Witches: The Real Story: The full narrative account of the 1612 trials and the people at the centre of them

→ The Law of Fear: A Judicial Audit of the 1612 Lancashire Witch Trials: The legal mechanics of the prosecution, including the 1604 Act's evidentiary standards and the judges who applied them

→ The 1612 Lancashire Pendle Witch Trials: A Systemic Judicial Failure: What happened to English witchcraft law, and to the Pendle case's reputation, in the century after this verdict

→ Jennet Device: The Child Witness of the 1612 Pendle Witch Trials: The nine-year-old whose testimony sent her own family to the gallows

→ Roger Nowell's Role and the 1612 Assizes: The magistrate who orchestrated the prosecutions and why he wanted convictions

→ Thomas Potts and the 1612 Pendle Trials: The scribe who turned the trials into state-sponsored propaganda

→ Trial by Water: The Dark History of Witch Ducking: The brutal testing methods used to identify witches across England

→ Witchcraft in the Middle Ages: The broader history of witchcraft belief that made the Pendle trials possible

About the Author

Simon A. Williams

Simon A. Williams

Historical Communicator, Author & Editor-in-Chief

Simon A. Williams is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of Histories and Castles, and a historical communicator rather than an academic writing for other academics: his job is turning primary-source research into stories a general reader will actually finish. Raised in North Wales within sight of Edward I's Iron Ring fortresses including Rhuddlan, Conwy, Flint, and Caernarfon, his work is anchored by direct field research and the analysis of institutional primary records rather than secondary paraphrase. He is the author of four books, stocked by Foyles and Waterstones as well as sold on Amazon.

The Deep Dive History Podcasts

Regular podcasts by Histories and Castles to help you get a deep dive understanding of histories events and figures.

The Crusades c.1095–1149: Eduqas GCSE Study Guide
Eduqas GCSE Study Guide

The Crusades c.1095–1149

  • Active Recall
  • Exam Practice
  • Test Yourself
BUY NOW