Posted on by

Stephen of Blois

image of stephen of blois

A King’s Turbulent Reign

When King Henry I of England died in December 1135, it left the English succession disputed as his only legitimate heir, Empress Matilda, was abroad in Anjou, while his nephew Stephen of Blois was fortuitously placed in England. This set the stage for Stephen of Blois chaotic and ultimately failed reign in medieval England that saw the country plunged into nearly 20 years of civil war, turbulence and lawlessness in a period that came to be known as “The Anarchy”.

The absence of Henry I’s lawful heir, Matilda, gave Stephen his opportunity to seize the English crown for himself immediately upon the death of his uncle. However, this also sparked a bitter rivalry with Matilda herself who asserted her rightful claim to the throne as the descendant of previous Kings of England and the designated successor to her father. Their struggle for the English monarchy during King Stephen’s time on the throne sheds light on the complex issues of succession during the Middle Ages, as well as the disastrous consequences that could arise when the nobility descended into infighting rather than uniting behind a strong leader. The turbulence and conflict that characterised Stephen’s rule would be his ultimate undoing, but it also gave rise to the great Plantagenet dynasty that would define a new era for England.

Stephen’s Ascension to the Throne

Empress Matilda: The Woman Who Would Be Queen

A Claimant to the Throne

As the grandson of William the Conqueror, Stephen of Blois had strong royal lineage that enabled him to pursue the English crown upon King Henry I’s death. While he lacked the strongest direct claim to the throne, as Empress Matilda was still alive as Henry’s designated heir, Stephen sought to capitalise on the uncertainty over the succession by putting himself forward swiftly as a claimant while Matilda remained abroad in Anjou.

Seizing the Chance

With King Henry I having failed to produce any legitimate surviving sons late in his reign, the line of succession was left vulnerable when he died in 1135. Stephen saw an opportunity to promote his candidacy and, fortuitously located in England at the time, was able to seize the initiative. He won over key members of the nobility and clergy such as the Archbishop of Canterbury to support his coronation and pursuit of power. This ruthlessness to have himself crowned so swiftly after his uncle’s demise demonstrated Stephen’s strong personal ambition.

A New King, Disputed

Within a few weeks of Henry I’s death, Stephen had engineered enough backing from noble factions to have himself crowned King on 22 December 1135. It was a narrow window, but with Empress Matilda still in France, Stephen was able to gain the crucial momentum to have his authority established as the new English monarch. However, Matilda herself refused to acknowledge Stephen’s legitimacy. This created a looming threat to his reign and portended the civil strife ahead.

The Anarchy

Civil War

After Stephen claimed the throne, Empress Matilda garnered support to dispute his right to rule, refusing to acknowledge him as the legitimate monarch. This lack of unified succession plunged England into nearly 20 years of civil war as the two sides battled across the country, neither gaining decisive superiority.

Contested Authority

With Matilda commanding strong allies in the West Country and Stephen retaining London and the Church’s support, both factions had bases of power. Stephen won some notable battlefield victories, capturing Matilda in 1141, but could never fully conquer areas loyal to her or overcome the threat she posed. This meant Stephen struggled to enforce true royal authority across the whole realm at any point.

Chaos and Disorder

The sustained conflict between Empress Matilda and King Stephen created instability across England as nobles exploited the uncertainty at court to expand their own regional influence. Law and order broke down frequently, exacerbated by famine and rising prices. Castles were constructed without crown permission and coinage was debased significantly. The country was left exposed to the whims of feuding barons.

medieval houses on fire

The Ravaged Countryside

As the civil war dragged on without resolution, the English countryside bore the brunt of the impact as armies rampaged across land to further their militaristic causes. The war brought suffering to common people as crops and villages were destroyed in the barons’ battles for supremacy, showing how little the high nobility cared for protecting the realm.

Later Rule and Death

Compromise and Truce

By the early 1150s, both sides had been significantly weakened by the endless conflict and a realisation emerged that a truce was needed. This led to the Treaty of Wallingford in 1153, brokered by the Church, in which it was agreed that Stephen would remain King but Matilda’s son Henry Plantagenet would succeed him upon his death.

Continued Struggles

The peace was short-lived unfortunately, as hostilities reignited in 1153 over Stephen’s attempts to have his own son recognised as heir instead. Despite the treaty, Stephen failed to command authority or constrain the independence of his rebellious barons who continued warring. The country remained in an insecure state throughout his final year of rule.

End of the Reign

Stephen’s health had been in steady decline when he finally died in October 1154. While some loyal nobles mourned him, for many across England and Normandy, his death marked a welcome end to the nearly 20 year period defined by civil war, lawlessness and fractured leadership that plagued his reign. Few were sad to see him go.

Legacy of Chaos

Ultimately, Stephen was unable to recover from the early contested bid for the crown that Matilda and others posed, dooming his rule to be dominated by disputes he could never permanently quell. The compromise made to succeed him with Henry Plantagenet only opened further unrest in Stephen’s last years. His reign had been an abject failure scarred by anarchy from which England needed to build itself anew.

Legacy

Reputation as Inept Ruler

King Stephen is regarded by historians as an ultimately weak and ineffective ruler who failed to demonstrate the decisiveness and command necessary to properly govern England during turbulent times. While the civil war was not necessarily his own doing, his contested claim to the throne and inability to ever achieve total victory over his rivals or control the barons forfeited his authority.

England Scarred

The near 20 year period of Stephen’s rule left England scarred by the ravages of civil warfare, famine and lawlessness that consumed the era now aptly named The Anarchy by scholars. Stephen himself failed to maintain order, the countryside and populace suffered greatly from the wanton nobles’ disputes, while the empty treasury and proliferation of adulterated coins wrecked financial stability.

Henry Plantagenet

Rise of the Plantagenets

Though he defeated Empress Matilda’s forces on occasion, Stephen could never remove the threat she posed or fully best her claims to the Crown. The later Treaty of Wallingford compromised that her heir Henry Plantagenet would succeed Stephen upon his death, directly leading to the rise of the mighty Plantagenet dynasty under Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine subsequently.

A Cautionary Tale

The turmoil of Stephen’s contested reign demonstrated the strife that battles over succession in the Middle Ages could unleash when there was no undisputed and capable heir. It served as a cautionary tale on the necessity of clear succession plans to preserve stability in the realm and avoid plunging a kingdom into the dire fate of civil war similar to that suffered under King Stephen.

Conclusion

Ambition Undid a King

Stephen of Blois allowed personal ambition to ultimately undo his reign, by seizing the royal throne over his more legitimate rivals. This engendered opposition that he could never overcome and condemned his rule to civil war. Though external factors conspired against him, his impatient pursuit of power for its own sake carried much blame for the ensuing anarchy.

Rule Subsumed by Inner Turmoil

For all his occasional battlefield victories, Stephen could not stop England subsiding into the “Anarchy” that plagued his tenure as king. The ceaseless disputes with Empress Matilda’s forces and the rebellious, unconstrained barons meant Stephen rarely held meaningful control over the realm at any point. Inner turmoil came to define his reign more than any rulership.

The Path for Future Glory

Ironically, Stephen’s utter failure to impose himself emphatically as England’s undisputed ruler paved the way for future glory under Henry II and his heirs. The Plantagenet dynasty would rise from the English Crown passing to Matilda’s son, finally ending the norman rivalry and bloodshed which Stephen had fanw the flames of with his ill-fated crowning in 1135.

A Doomed Reign

Few English monarchs suffered such a disastrous reign that was so dolefully steeped in civil war, lawlessness and fractured loyalties than King Stephen. That he clung to his crown under great adversity for 15 years could not disguise that his rule was ill-starred and doomed from his tenuous coronation. The “Anarchy” will forever be a blight against his name in the pages of history.

Related Articles